refers to a landmark case decided with the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Below’s a brief overview:
Although the punishment can be severe, its purpose is just not solely to seek vengeance but to deter opportunity offenders and copyright the principles of justice and social order.
Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID required) to criminal and traffic case information from the general district courts for your purpose of confirming an individual’s date of birth.
The explained recovery can be used, on the most, for corroboration of your main evidence, but by itself it cannot be described as a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of event. The explained memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as very little was discovered because of these types of pointation. The place of prevalence as well as the place of throwing the dead body were already within the knowledge of witnesses just before their pointation with the petitioners. Reliance is usually placed on case law titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it has been held with the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
eighty two . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for your accused who intentionally murdered the target.
The Court regarded the case for being maintainable under Article 184 (3) since the danger and encroachment alleged were such as to violate the constitutional right click here to life when interpreted expansively.
nine. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above mentioned order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
All bankruptcy courts have a telephone information system, also known as the Voice Case Information System, that enables callers to obtain fundamental case information through a touchtone phone. This is free to use and obtainable 24 hours daily.
Using keywords effectively is likewise critical. Consider using synonyms and variations of your keywords to ensure you capture all relevant results. Understanding the citation system used by Pakistani courts will also help you pinpoint specific cases.
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent could not be proved Except case is tried using(Bail Matters)
13309-B of 2010 to get weak types of evidence as well as evidentiary value whereof would be found at the time with the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Hence, confirmed custody on the petitioner in jail is unlikely to serve any advantageous purpose at this stage.”
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are founded by executive companies based on statutes.